When Russia conducted a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, a significant step was made in the direction of making the most of the principle of universal jurisdiction. With Russia’s war of aggression well into its third year, the concept to prosecute war crimes in Ukraine in other national courts is garnering new supporters and strategies to ensure that no stone on justice and accountability is left unturned
The first use of the principle of universal jurisdiction in the context of Ukraine was brought within days of Russia’s attack on Ukraine, with several prosecutors opening structural investigations into the core international crimes allegedly perpetrated by Russia in Ukraine. Over subsequent months, several cases were filed with prosecutors across Europe, especially in Germany and Austria. For example, in October 2023, German prosecutors were presented with evidence of alleged Russian war crimes in Odesa, Kharkiv, and Kyiv. German courts have been at the forefront of efforts to apply the principle of universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators of international crimes globally, including for crimes in Syria, Iraq, and elsewhere.
In December 2023, the United States unsealed a Criminal Indictment charging four Russian military officials with committing war crimes involving a United States victim who was living in southern Ukraine at the time of the invasion. This marked the first case of conditional universal jurisdiction related to the 2022 full-scale invasion, with charges based on the citizenship of the victim.
As momentum builds, legal advocates are strategizing ways to invoke the concept more broadly. Earlier this month, a conference organized at the CEELI Institute, together with the International Bar Association and the Center for International Law and Policy in Africa, brought together national prosecutors, international law experts, representatives of international organizations, and civil society in Prague to discuss universal jurisdiction, including structural investigations, prosecutions, and likely hurdles.
Throughout the two-day conference, participants shared practical solutions, emphasizing the need for greater coordination among nations, political will, and international support to bolster the application of universal jurisdiction.
To capture these insights, the organizers of the conference prepared a “Prague Statement,” outlining the key recommendations and reflections from the discussions, offering a roadmap for future efforts to pursue universal jurisdiction.
Read the full article here