DEMAS together with 230 civil society organisations have come together to express concern and opposition to a proposed ‘foreign interference’ directive within the European Commission’s upcoming Defence of Democracy package.
Civil society organisations have a key role to play in vibrant democracies, and are essential to address challenges currently facing our society such as a just transition, defence of rule of law and protection of fundamental rights. While civil society is central to confronting these challenges, experiences across Europe demonstrate that their place in society can be precarious, and the European Union has historically been a defender of civil society and civic space.
The European Commission’s upcoming Defence of Democracy package contains some welcome initiatives to enhance democratic participation and civic space, but the proposed ‘foreign interference’ directive has raised concerns among civil society across Europe.
The proposed directive would introduce ‘transparency and accountability standards’ for civil society organisations, requiring them to disclose funding from outside the EU and creating a register of organisations that receive such funding. This proposal echoes other proposed ‘foreign influence legislation’ that can have negative consequences, such as narrowing space for civil society to perform its functions and silencing of critical voices. Furthermore, this directive is similar to legislation that the EU has itself opposed in the past, undermining the EU’s credibility to speak out against the use of such legislation to suppress civil society in non-EU countries or even to support civil society organizations working on human rights and democracy globally.
Civil society is a strong supporter of enhanced transparency and accountability while preserving space for independent civil society to carry out its activities. As such, civil society organisations call on the Commission to consider three factors ahead of any proposed legislation: (1) the requirement for a fundamental rights impact assessment, (2) clarity and purpose of such a directive, and (3) the EU’s fundamental rights obligations.
Please, read the full statement here.