On June 7, Armenians went to cast their vote in parliamentary elections. With the highest turnout since 2018, Nikol Pashinyan’s Civil Contract party won the majority. “Despite trauma, displacement, and uncertainty, citizens chose to engage. They chose ballots over violence, dialogue over division, and participation over apathy. In doing so, they chose hope”, writes Gulnara Shahinian, Member of the ICDR, founder and director of Democracy Today.
“The lesson of Armenia’s election is not that the country has chosen Europe over Russia. It is that Armenians have chosen to preserve room for maneuver. Europe’s role should be to help them keep it,” warns Katia Glod, ICDR member and Deputy Head of Foreign Policy at New Eurasian Strategy Centre.
Gulnara Shahinian
Member of the ICDR, founder and director of Democracy Today, Armenia
There are moments in the life of a nation when an election becomes more than a political event. It becomes a reflection of who people are, what they have endured, and what they still dare to hope for. For Armenia, June 7, 2026, was one of those moments.
In modern Armenia, I can hardly remember another election where people stood in long lines—sometimes for more than half an hour—just to cast their vote. Families came together. Parents brought their children not only to vote, but to show them what democracy looks like in practice. It was a quiet civic lesson: the future of a country is shaped by participation, not by passivity.
Nearly 59 percent of eligible voters participated in parliamentary elections. Behind this figure were countless personal stories shaped by war, displacement, loss, and uncertainty. Many citizens had lived through the consequences of conflict, the forced displacement of more than 115,000 Armenians from Artsakh, persistent economic hardship, and years of political polarization. Yet, they still chose to participate. In their choice lies the essence of this election.
Democracy, in Armenia’s case, is not an abstract system. It is a lived experience shaped by struggle. Since independence, Armenia has chosen democracy as the foundation of its statehood. It has done so while facing war, insecurity, regional instability, and constant geopolitical pressure. This path has come at a high cost, but it has also cultivated something essential: a society that continues to believe in its right to decide its own future.
The June 7 elections were therefore more than a routine parliamentary vote. They became a defining moment in Armenia’s contemporary history—a collective decision about security, peace, sovereignty, and the country’s place in an increasingly unstable world. These elections took place during one of the most difficult periods since independence. The consequences of war continue to shape daily life. The displacement of Armenians from Artsakh remains a deep national trauma. Security concerns persist. Economic pressures continue. Regional and global geopolitical tensions have intensified. People chose democracy at the time of trauma.
Trauma does not only leave physical scars; it reshapes trust, perception, and political behavior. In societies affected by trauma, fear and uncertainty often grow stronger, and political polarization deepens. In such contexts, democratic participation is not guaranteed—it becomes an act of resilience.
On June 7, Armenians chose participation over withdrawal. They chose engagement over silence. That choice matters.
It suggests that even under conditions of uncertainty and grief, citizens continue to see active democracy as a space where their voice still has meaning.
The election campaign reflected the central dilemmas facing Armenian society. Public debate revolved around urgent and deeply personal questions: How can Armenia ensure its security in a volatile region? What does a just and lasting peace require? How can sovereignty and dignity be preserved while pursuing stability and development? These were not theoretical debates. They were lived questions, present in every household conversation about the future.
The elections therefore represented not only a contest between political parties but also a broader societal decision between competing visions of Armenia’s future—between different interpretations of security, peace, and development in a fragile regional environment. Doing so, Armenia joined the family of democratic states.
Like many democracies today, Armenia faces challenges that extend beyond traditional political competition.
Hybrid threats—including disinformation, cyber risks, and external efforts to influence public discourse—have become part of the political environment. Not only candidates who were not citizens of the country have been send by Russia to compete, but also many dual citizens were bribed to come to Armenia to support the Russian candidate.
These pressures rarely aim only to shape electoral outcomes. Their deeper objective is to erode trust, deepen divisions, and weaken confidence in democratic institutions themselves.
In such conditions, the resilience of democracy depends not only on formal institutions but also on societal awareness, media independence, digital literacy, and civic responsibility. Elections alone are not enough; democracy requires continuous protection.
One of the most important features of the June 7 elections was the role of Armenian civil society.
Independent journalists, election observers, human rights defenders, youth organizations, women’s groups, and community initiatives worked throughout the electoral process to strengthen transparency, counter misinformation, and promote informed participation.
Much of this work remained invisible to the wider public. Yet it played a crucial role in maintaining trust in the process.
Civil society acted as a bridge between citizens and institutions. It helped ensure that elections were not only conducted, but also observed, explained, and understood. “Democracy Today” joined many civil society organizations to monitor elections in the communities.
This is a reminder that democracy is not sustained by governments alone. It is sustained by citizens who are willing to protect it—often quietly, consistently, and without recognition.
Women played a vital role throughout the electoral process—not only as voters and candidates, but also as journalists, observers, educators, peacebuilders, and community leaders. Their participation reflects a broader democratic truth: inclusion strengthens resilience. When women are meaningfully engaged in public life, democratic institutions become more accountable, more responsive, and better equipped to manage complexity. Their leadership is not symbolic—it is structural to democratic sustainability.
The elections also highlight an important shift in how security is understood. Security is no longer defined solely by military capacity or territorial defense. It is also shaped by trust in institutions, social cohesion, economic opportunity, human rights, and the ability of citizens to participate in shaping their future. This is the essence of human security: protecting people as much as borders. Without trust, inclusion, and dignity, no society can be truly secure, regardless of its military strength. Conversely, societies that invest in democratic participation and social cohesion build deeper and more sustainable resilience.
The significance of Armenia’s June 7 elections extends far beyond its borders.
Across the world, democracies are under pressure—from war, authoritarian tendencies, disinformation, and declining public trust. In this global context, Armenia offers an important lesson.
Democracy is not tested in moments of comfort. It is tested in moments of uncertainty.
It survives when citizens continue to participate even when circumstances are difficult, when institutions are defended under pressure, and when hope is sustained despite loss.
The June 7 elections did not resolve all of Armenia’s challenges. The country still faces complex questions about peace, security, development, justice, and reconciliation.
But they revealed something essential about Armenian society. Despite trauma, displacement, and uncertainty, citizens chose to engage. They chose ballots over violence, dialogue over division, and participation over apathy. In doing so, they chose hope.
And hope, when collectively expressed, becomes more than an emotion. It becomes a political force.
The June 7 elections remind us that democracy is not a destination reached once and for all. It is a continuous act of courage—built through participation, sustained through trust, and renewed with every generation.
On that day, Armenia did not simply hold an election. Armenian people chose hope.
Full article here